Interview: “Beauty and the Beast” Co-Producer Steve Gaub

This was essentially Disney’s first full-blown musical fantasy since Pete’s Dragon in 1977. It’s a genre that’s often difficult to pull off and do well with the public, but this seems to have struck gold. This is a very, very big movie. How long were you involved?

STEVE GAUB: I started in October of 2014. We moved to London of 2015, bringing on all the other crew and the other departments for preproduction. We shot from the summer of 2015 production through 2016. For me, it was about two and a half years of my life.

GREG: And it’s a lovely production and looks great in the Blu-ray, but there’s that elephant in the room. With a classic animated film already in existence, why do it?

STEVE: Very fair question, and it was certainly in the minds of a lot of people. I think it was just a good opportunity to update a property for a new generation.

GREG: Like the recent Jungle Book and Cinderella, maybe one way to see these live-action versions is as complementary interpretations, and a way to dive deeper into the stories and the characters. A good example in Beauty and the Beast is Belle’s father, who gets to be more than “silly old Maurice” and is given added dimension by Kevin Kline.

STEVE: Yes, he’s excellent. The whole cast embraced there characters and entered their world. And as you can see when you watch it, no detail was spared. All the songs are there, plus some new music.

GREG: Speaking of music, this film was a very substantial box office hit. When Hollywood considers this, along with La La Land and even Frozen, which is undeniably a musical, does this—I don’t like to use the overuse the phrase “bring back”—but maybe affirm the viability of the musical as a genre that the public has embraced?

STEVE: That’s anyone’s guess, but if our efforts had anything to do with it, we’re delighted.

Beauty and the Beast is now available on Blu-ray with a number of special features but alas, no audio commentary (sacre bleu!)